By: Aidan
I know this is off topic for this blog post, but please reconsider ESPN3 — if you can get it cheap enough, it’s worth it. Let’s worry about other pay-per-play offerings down the road: for now, ESPN...
View ArticleBy: Aidan
Hi Dane, For me, I’d say it would be worth $5 per month. Sometimes we watch an entire tennis tournament up to the finals (finals are often cut off when broadcast on a regular tv channel). I’d say a lot...
View ArticleBy: Adam Lang
Been ages since your last update. How goes the fibre-in-SF thing? How goes the progress towards per-number blocking of callers? (I have three bill collectors who I don’t owe anything to, but because I...
View ArticleBy: Ram
I just signed up and love that the CEO is answering to comments. Question – how is mandatory bundling of wireline phone service different than offering ESPN3? Everyone is forced to pay for a service...
View ArticleBy: Dane Jasper
I don’t believe that the majority of our customers don’t want or need the voice line – and it would be a real challenge for us to offer the product two ways. We’ve thus made the choice to build a “one...
View ArticleBy: Ram
Thanks much for the reply, Dane. It should be easy enough to pull a histogram of voice minutes used by # of subscribers, no? (what % of subscribers use <X voice minutes per month) I appreciate the...
View ArticleBy: Ram
Seems like the commenting system didn’t escape my < symbol correctly (security issues?). In any case, repeating below: Thanks much for the reply, Dane. It should be easy enough to pull a histogram...
View ArticleBy: Dane Jasper
My overall issue with the ESPN3 model is that group buying of a content object via mandatory bundling with an access provider seems like a bad formula for the Internet. How will that scale, as more and...
View Article
